Most companies are focused on employee engagement and understand the benefits for retention, customer experience and the bottom line.
Some just “talk the talk and don’t walk the walk”.
A few don’t even crawl.
The latter would apply to the senior management responsible for an insurance contact center team I’m writing about today. Incidentally, this is not one of my clients but maybe they should be.
A little background on the employees: They are a small satellite center a few hours away from the headquarters where a large 100 seat center is located. The contact center agents handle customer service calls and walk-ins needing help. They appeared to have a good system of shared work loads and they worked well together. They even spent a few months “self-managing” since their local Supervisor retired and was not immediately replaced.
Senior management finally posted the open Supervisor position. Two of the eight employees at the small center were interested in the promotion and so interviewed and tested. One candidate handled a lot of special projects for the center; the other was always asked to participate in new technology development and testing of systems and procedures. Both had excellent work histories and quality of service. Both had letters of praise from customers.
Both were offered the Supervisor’s job and declined.
Why would these long time, loyal employees turn down this great opportunity to become leaders with the company? Unbelievable as it may seem, they were offered lower salaries for this promotion than what they were earning as Agents. When each questioned the amount, Human Resources said that the VP had said that was all to be offered. They decided to remain as Agents instead of taking on more responsibility for considerably less money.
Then, the supervisor replacement took an interesting and insulting twist. They hired someone from the outside with no customer service or contact center experience. He had never processed an insurance claim or worked with the industry either. And more fun…those two agents were asked to train him.
There are some more great moments in Employee Engagement with this same team:
Communication:
- An Agent relocated from headquarters to join the satellite team. The first day, the other Agents saw her leave at 4pm. She told them “We always leave at 4pm at headquarters”. The satellite team always worked until 4:30pm and never knew that the other contact center agents in the large 100 seat center left that early. No explanation was given.
Knowledge base errors:
- Agents are receiving “errors” from quality control despite showing the quality people (in writing) that the knowledge base has two differing answers for the same procedure. Management ignores and the errors continue on their performance reports.
Performance feedback (NOT coaching!):
- 98.8 accuracy performance stats (99% accuracy is goal) are emailed to an agent by headquarters manager who asks, “Why are you making all these mistakes?” (note to manager: SEE KNOWLEDGE BASE ERRORS ABOVE FOR ANSWER.)
Rewards and recognition:
- Agents receive letters from customers with compliments for service but management never acknowledges or rewards.
- Agent sent to internal conference with supervisors from other national locations. He is the only agent attending because his former supervisor was afraid of technology and didn’t like to travel. His suggestions end up saving company time and increase effectiveness. He never is told thank you or given an incentive for his cost saving and efficiency suggestions that worked.
Recently, the president of this same company sent out an eloquently written letter to all employees saying how they must all “focus on the customer”.
I heard the satellite team laughed when they read it. They said he never mentioned any appreciation for what they or the other agents were already doing for customers. The two who rejected the poorly offered promotion have expressed an interest in looking for new jobs. I hope they find something worthy of their great skills and work ethic.
Employees don’t need the president to tell them to focus on customers. What they need is for the president to say, “We are focused on YOU, so in turn, you can provide the best customer experience”. And then he needs to take action and do what he says.
Not holding my breath on that one…are you?
Filed under: Call Center, Employee Engagement, Employee job satisfaction, Employee Motivation, Employee Retention, Employee Turnover, Human Resources, Leadership, Promoting Employees, Work Environment Tagged: | Business, Call Center, Contact Center, Customer Service, Employee engagement, Employee job satisfaction, Employee Retention, Human resources, Leadership, Management, Motivation




Hi Melissa,
This is actually a very sad story! Clearly the leadership of this company doesn’t grasp the idea that the best way to engage and retain their valued customers is through engagement and retention of their employees. When the “focus on the customer” is not aligned with “focus on the employee,” it doesn’t take long for the employees to see AND FEEL the disconnect. I wonder if top leadership in this company is even aware of how disconnected they are.
Bill Leinweber
Landmark Experience LLC
Hi Bill,
Thanks for sharing your insight with us! From employee comments, it appears that the leadership in VP roles are more focused on cutting cost and worried about the larger center. This satellite group is considered a necessary evil due to the number of customers near the center who still like to come into the center front lobby for problem resolution. I have a feeling they know but are taking advantage of the challenging job economy to push employees to the limit and beyond.
Ouch … a perfect case study of what not to do. Your comment about taking advantage of a challenging job economy reminded me of a time I was in a meeting with a group of senior executives. Cost-cutting measures were being discussed, many related to employee benefits. A comment overheard was “People are just happy to have a job. Where else will they go?” Not a customer service focused attitude.
Laurie, thanks for sharing your own experience here. Truly sad to hear. From all of the comments here and on my social media posts it’s clear my story isn’t an isolated event
I was disappointed in how the president related to his employees in the written communcation but I see things differently in the small satellite center. Management obviously saw a need to promote one of the eight employees. It is not unusual for management to wait a few months before replacing a supervisor who retires or is promoted out. This is done to save money and give the people who are left behind a chance to excel. When the two who were interested declined the promotion management brought in someone “new.” This is a typical response. I would have jumped at the chance to take a promotion and a cut in salary. After all, I’ve not proven myself in the higher level position. That’s how I see it!
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on my post! It’s great to hear different points of view.
Hi Melissa, thank you for such interesting and instructive case.
You’re welcome! Glad you found helpful